“One signature away from fracking”

An editorial from the Riverdale Press on why we can’t depend upon the Watershed to protect us from fracking.

____

The Riverdale Press
September 1, 2011
EDITORIAL COMMENT

Open your fracking mouth

Now that we are done obsessing over a potential natural disaster, we can refocus on our state’s inching toward a man-made one.

After parsing the Department of Environmental Protection’s most recent documentation of the impact of hydrofracking in New York State, Anne Marie Garti, a local environmental advocate, has emerged with a message for people who live in New York, Westchester County and the Catskill and Delaware watersheds: Don’t get comfortable.

“You are a signature away from being at risk from hydrofracking,” she wrote in an e-mail to anyone who would listen.

New York City is among the locales that have so-far been spared from the imminent threat of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the process of extracting natural gas by drilling wells and injecting water, sand and chemicals under high pressure.

It is not entirely clear which chemicals are used in the process because of what’s called the “Halliburton Loophole” in a 2005 Bush/Cheney energy bill that exempts gas drilling from the Safe Drinking Water Act and allows gas companies to treat their chemical recipes as trade secrets.

Public pressure has forced several drillers to voluntarily release their recipes for frack water and the revelations aren’t reassuring. Several of the ingredients are known carcinogens or cause other health problems.

The only reason we have not yet been directly threatened by the dangerous and mysterious process is that we qualify for filtration avoidance under the Environmental Protection Agency’s Surface Water Treatment Rule.

But there is nothing permanent about our status, Ms. Garti says. And she’s right. According to the EIS, there would be no fracking allowed within 4,000 feet of the city as long as we maintain filtration avoidance. But that status is up for renewal in 2017 and a number of conditions could even lead to its elimination before then.“How might this happen?” she asks. “Let’s say there are a series of storms that result in turbidity levels exceeding the ‘clear water’ standard … The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will make allowances for two such occurrences in one year, or five such occurrences in 10 years. Given the extreme weather conditions that accompany global climate change, it is not hard to imagine having an unusual series of storms that cause excessive flooding.”

Hurricane, er, tropical storm Irene anyone?

And there’s more where that came from. If there is one instance of a waterborne disease in the city, that is another cause for us to lose our status, according to Ms. Garti.

Fifteen community boards, including Bronx boards 7 and 8, have signed resolutions calling for statewide fracking bans. Numerous groups, including the Park Slope Food Coop, have mobilized around the issue.

Now is not the time to stop. Along with Ms. Garti, we encourage local residents not to be lulled into submission. We hope to see more action in Riverdale and Kingsbridge and for our notoriously vocal community to be outspoken during the 60-day public comment period which began on Wednesday, Aug. 31

Click here to see the editorial online at Riverdale Press.

To find you how you can help stop fracking in Andes and plan for a frack-free economy, please click here or email us at info@andesworks.com.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Activism, Andes, Fracking, NY, Press and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s